中古車を探す | トヨタカローラ南海.Navigation menu

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

When Olympus introduced the original Micro Four Thirds PEN E-P1 almost 4 years ago in June , it was the first mirrorless interchangeable lens camera to adopt a compact, \’rangefinder-style\’ body that made no pretence to look like an SLR. It also saw the company striking out in a direction it\’s followed ever since – designing attractive yet capable little cameras that consciously draw on its long-running film camera heritage. It includes many of the features that made the E-M5 such a compelling package, such as the same 16MP MOS sensor, advanced \’5-axis\’ in-body image stabilization now with automatic panning detection , 9 fps continuous shooting, and tilting rear touch screen.

One key change compared to previous E-Px models is a rearrangement of the controls – gone are the thumb roller and tiny rear dial, replaced by \’proper\’ front and rear dials that protrude horizontally from the top plate.

The E-P5 features what Olympus calls a \’2×2\’ dial interface: a small lever on the back of the camera switches these dials from controlling exposure parameters to changing ISO and white balance.

If you don\’t like this arrangement, the lever can be customized to a couple of other options described later in this review. This is aided by the addition of an ISO equivalent \’LOW\’ setting, although this will likely come at the expense of some highlight clipping. The E-P5 also offers a fast startup time of just 0. In traditional Olympus fashion the E-P5 gets a few new features compared to previous models.

There\’s a \’Super-spot AF\’ mode that allows extremely precise positioning of the AF point when using magnified live view, very much like the one seen on recent Panasonic models. It gains timed intervalometer shooting, along with the ability to assemble time-lapse movies in-camera.

The Live Bulb mode, that allows you to monitor the progress of long exposures while the shutter is open, now features an on-screen histogram to help monitor exposure build-up. The image stabilization system is also now always active by default, to provide a stabilized live view feed especially useful when using telephoto lenses.

This is essentially an extension of Art Filters, allowing you to generate multi-image composites rather like the pages of a photo book, in a wide variety of themes. It may not be something enthusiast photographers will use all the time, and arguably better suited to lower-end PEN models, but it\’s good to see Olympus continuing to come up with new ideas. The E-P5 comes in three colour schemes; black, silver and white. The all-black version that we\’ve shown in this review has a textured matte finish which we expect will be appreciated by street photographers – it looks particularly fine when coupled with the black versions of the M.

Zuiko Digital 17mm Zuiko Digital 45mm Zuiko Digital ED 75mm The camera also comes in a very handsome silver-and-black finish that harks back to Olympus\’s classic cameras from the s and \’70s, and a white version with a beige grip.

Olympus will also be offering a limited edition model with a wooden grip, and a range of premium accessories such as leather cases. The E-P5 will be available either body-only for approx. Zuiko Digital mm Zuiko Digital 17mm F1. Hi all Pen E-P5 users I recently bought this camera with firmware 1. Anyone done this before? Cheers and happy shooting. I recently picked up this camera from my local bricks and mortar camera store. I will be posting a review in a few weeks after I have had time to take some photo\’s make some prints and do some comparisons.

So far I see no evidence of so called \”shutter shock\” at the relevant shutter speeds and I am not using any of the special anti-shock settings Firmware Ver. But then again, I never saw them on the E-pl1 either. Something I\’m curious about In the studio scene the E-P5 seems unable to resolve the king of club\’s hair, something which the E-M10 does easily and the GX-7 too , and in fact the image seems slightly soft throughout.

I\’ve not noticed this softness in other images from this camera, but since I\’m trying to decide whether to buy one I\’d like to know if there is any other explanation! Well, it\’s good to hear Olympus got around to trying to fix this issue in the E-P5. I wonder if the same will happen for their other cameras. It is essential to keep it turned off to avoid dreadful double image blur.

I have no idea why it\’s so much more pathetic than the IS of the E-PL2 poor, but not normally harmful to sharpness except with telephoto lenses and E-P2 quite good at times. Good news! Just received an info from olympus service Europe that a new firmware 1. As a matter of fact, the metering display bug introduced by FW 1. After the fact is doesn\’t help much. While Olympus is working on a fix – I would definitely like to roll back to FW 1.

Very frustrating. I agree Paul. I too have observed the same metering display problem on my camera after upgrading to 1. Is Olympus aware of the problem? My discussion with oly service in Germany lead to the fact, that they ackowledged the problem after few hours and said, they communicated it to Japan. It is all about setting priorities. As long as only few people complain, oly might prefer to work on other projects, whatever the severity of the bug might be. I updated two day ago, and see no problem as described.

I updated with the VF4 mounted, maybe that could make the difference,or Oly already made a patch? But, well, the fix is annouced to be released within the next days. You certainly have the original FW 1. The fixed version should be FW 1. Perhaps it is best just to wait now – since it has been confirmed from various sites, oly is really working an a short term fix.

For the time being I activate live histogram – so that a force the camera to show the actual exposure settings. For me the workaround is having the histogram on, and wait for the 1.

However Olympus could have made the menu implementation of the anti-shock simpler and lamentable documentation of the feature much better. Thank goodness for various reviews which documented and illustrated how to implement. The menu system for this camera must be the most convoluted and obscure ever. Unfortunately FW 1. I would be happy if I could! But that seems to be impossible I have never \”road tested\” the EP5 – but what is significantly different in its mechanism than the EP2 that causes this blurring?

The E-P2 was merely a quick update to the E-P1. Okay, grain boundaries were hit very quickly, but that was not a big issue. I used to have ASA kodak negatives published at A3 – the vagaries of the printing process for all but the most expensive publications hid a multitude of sins – lpi on poor stock and cheap ink was the norm. I now have a PEN an old EP2, no rush to upgrade – and it\’s still important to have a range of possibilities when shooting offset litho is much better in the digital age too, so resolution and grain are important.

Of course, I could buy a full frame camera – but I have never liked bulk and don\’t fancy lumping those ridiculously ugly plastic bricks about. Its all a happy compromise, as ever. Does anybody remember Kodachrome 25? It was a very slow film that, given a decent camera, produced smooth, sharp slides, with great dynamic range. That\’s ISO 25 folks. The reason we all craved fast lenses was so we could use un-speckled films with greater freedom. That\’s the point, wide latitude to shoot.

It\’s why we badmouth the odd camera–it takes away our freedom. On an entry level SLR, f1. So here we are, electronic sensors that take us out to ISO without much noise, and a step more with heavier noise reduction that steals a bit of detail.

Typical kit zooms nowadays all start at f3. That is two stops slower than f1. Have it all. The standard primes used to be quite inexpensive. The marketing department sticking it to us is what happened On the other hand it is great fun shooting in candle light with my M at ISO or above and f0. I still use Kodak T-Max in my M4 but film grain is somehow much more acceptable than digital noise. The reduction in the noise of sensors over the last few years increases possibilities of imaging by a lot.

That means the shake problem cannot be fix when sequential shooting. Of course you drop rate to about fps at H Sequential. Now year later E-M1 is receiving a fv4. In any case there seem to be still 2 shutter movements. One before and one after the exposure.

Side remark: Despite of extensive testing I have never been able to find clear evidence of shutter induced blur with FW 1. And I don\’t see a clear improvement in this respect with FW 1.

Any Ideas or observations? Thanks, Paul. Sensor is then reset via electronic first curtain and the exposure ends in a regular way with mechanical 2nd curtain. I assume that 25ms difference is hard to observe by hearing.

It might be just a small firearm but it packs a punch. This makes it much nicer holding it in the hand, while being thin enough to carry on your waistband if you choose. This gives you a ton of options at your disposal, especially for holsters. Not only will you be able to use sights if you have a suppressor mounted, but you can also co-witness with an optic. Its round frame compensates for all the potential recoil a 10mm can bring.

Can you shoot. Its mild recoil, wide availability of accessories, and standard optics mount makes it a new standard for tiny, but mighty guns. View Results. Let us know in the comments section below! Follow us on Facebook , Instagram , Twitter , and Pinterest!

Disclaimer: All content on this site is for informational purposes only. Please read our full disclaimer here. Fone Safe3 Web Vulnerability Scanner 9. Hd Clone 4. Your email address will not be published. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. By using this form you agree with the storage and handling of your data by this website. Email: [email protected] Phone: All Rights Reserved This copyrighted material may not be republished without express permission.

The information presented here is for general educational purposes only. You should not rely solely on information contained in this email to evaluate the product or service being endorsed. Always exercise due diligence before purchasing any product or service. This website contains advertisements. We use cookies to personalize content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyze our traffic. You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

This site uses functional cookies and external scripts to improve your experience. Which cookies and scripts are used and how they impact your visit is specified on the left. You may change your settings at any time. Your choices will not impact your visit. NOTE: These settings will only apply to the browser and device you are currently using. This website uses cookies. Contents hide. Yes, I love the power of 10mm pistols in a small frame Yes, it\’s a great addition to my collection Maybe I\’ll buy one No, not my thing at all View Results.

Share this December 16, at AM. PatrickNub says:. December 16, at PM. Edwardfrady says:. December 17, at AM. December 17, at PM. December 18, at PM. December 19, at AM. December 19, at PM. Yondus says:. December 20, at PM. December 21, at AM. December 21, at PM. December 22, at AM. December 22, at PM. December 23, at AM. Ronaldcrito says:. December 27, at AM. Leave a Reply Cancel reply Your email address will not be published. American Gun Association – When you seek second amendment news, honest gun reviews and gun-friendly advice.

My settings. We would like to pass along this sure-fire report to keeping your firearms. Please fill out the form below :. First name Last name Email. Privacy settings. Privacy Settings This website uses cookies Privacy Settings This site uses functional cookies and external scripts to improve your experience. This website uses cookies We use cookies to personalize content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyze our traffic.

Powered by Cookie Information.

Adobe Photoshop is a raster graphics editor developed and published by Adobe Inc. It was originally created in by Thomas and John Knoll. Since then, the software has become the industry standard not only in raster graphics editing, but in digital art as a whole. The software\’s name is often colloquially used as a verb e.

In addition to raster graphics, Photoshop has limited abilities to edit or render text and vector graphics especially through clipping path for the latter , as well as 3D graphics and video. Its feature set can be expanded by plug-ins ; programs developed and distributed independently of Photoshop that run inside it and offer new or enhanced features.

Photoshop\’s naming scheme was initially based on version numbers. However, in October following the introduction of Creative Suite branding , each new version of Photoshop was designated with \” CS \” plus a number; e.

With the introduction of the Creative Cloud branding in June and in turn, the change of the \” CS \” suffix to \” CC \” , Photoshop\’s licensing scheme was changed to that of software as a service subscription model. As of November , Adobe has also released a full version of Photoshop for the iPad , and while initially limited, Adobe plans to bring more features to Photoshop for iPad.

Photoshop was developed in by two brothers Thomas and John Knoll , who sold the distribution license to Adobe Systems Incorporated in Thomas Knoll, a Ph. Thomas took a six-month break from his studies in to collaborate with his brother on the program. Thomas renamed the program ImagePro, but the name was already taken. During this time, John traveled to Silicon Valley and gave a demonstration of the program to engineers at Apple and Russell Brown, art director at Adobe.

Both showings were successful, and Adobe decided to purchase the license to distribute in September Photoshop 1. The handling of color slowly improved with each release from Adobe and Photoshop quickly became the industry standard in digital color editing. At the time Photoshop 1. The list price of Photoshop 1. Photoshop was initially only available on Macintosh.

The Windows port led to Photoshop reaching a wider mass market audience as Microsoft \’s global reach expanded within the next few years. Photoshop files have default file extension as.

PSD , which stands for \” P hoto s hop D ocument\”. This is in contrast to many other file formats e. JPG or. GIF that restrict content to provide streamlined, predictable functionality.

A PSD file has a maximum height and width of 30, pixels, and a length limit of two gigabytes. These formats are required to use the file in publications or on the web. Photoshop can also create and use files with the extension. PSB, which stands for \”Photoshop Big\” also known as \”large document format\”.

The dimension limit was apparently chosen arbitrarily by Adobe, not based on computer arithmetic constraints it is not close to a power of two, as is 30, but for ease of software testing.

Photoshop functionality can be extended by add-on programs called Photoshop plugins or plug-ins. Adobe creates some plugins, such as Adobe Camera Raw, but third-party companies develop most plugins, according to Adobe\’s specifications.

Some are free and some are commercial software. Most plugins work with only Photoshop or Photoshop-compatible hosts, but a few can also be run as standalone applications. There are various types of plugins, such as filter, export, import, selection, color correction, and automation.

The most popular plugins are the filter plugins also known as a 8bf plugins , available under the Filter menu in Photoshop. Filter plugins can either modify the current image or create content. Below are some popular types of plugins, and some well-known companies associated with them:. Adobe Camera Raw also known as ACR and Camera Raw is a special plugin, supplied free by Adobe, used primarily to read and process raw image files so that the resulting images can be processed by Photoshop.

Upon loading Photoshop, a sidebar with a variety of tools with multiple image-editing functions appears to the left of the screen. These tools typically fall under the categories of drawing ; painting ; measuring and navigation ; selection ; typing ; and retouching. These can be expanded to reveal similar tools. In some newer versions hovering along the tools gives a small Video glimpse of the tool. Photoshop includes a few versions of the pen tool. The pen tool creates precise paths that can be manipulated using anchor points.

The free form pen tool allows the user to draw paths freehand, and with the magnetic pen tool, the drawn path attaches closely to outlines of objects in an image, which is useful for isolating them from a background. The Clone Stamp tool duplicates one part of an image to another part of the same image by way of a brush. The duplication is either in full or in part depending on the mode.

The user can also clone part of one layer to another layer. The Clone Stamp tool is useful for duplicating objects or removing a defect in an image. Photoshop provides an array of shape tools including rectangles, rounded rectangles, ellipses, polygons and lines. These shapes can be manipulated by the pen tool, direct selection tool etc. In addition, Photoshop provides its own shapes like animals, signs and plants.

The eyedropper tool selects a color from an area of the image that is clicked, and samples it for future use. Selection tools are used to select all or any part of a picture to perform cut, copy, edit, or retouching operations. The crop tool can be used to select a particular area of an image and discard the portions outside the chosen section.

This tool assists in creating a focus point on an image and unnecessary or excess space. The crop tool is in the tools palette, which is located on the right side of the document. By placing the cursor over the image, the user can drag the cursor to the desired area.

Once the Enter key is pressed, the area outside the rectangle will be cropped. The area outside the rectangle is the discarded data, which allows for the file size to be decreased. The slice and slice select tools, like the crop tool, are used in isolating parts of images. The slice tool can be used to divide an image into different sections, and these separate parts can be used as pieces of a web page design once HTML and CSS are applied. The move tool can be used to drag the entirety of a single layer or more if they are selected.

Alternatively, once an area of an image is highlighted, the move tool can be used to manually relocate the selected piece to anywhere on the canvas. The marquee is a tool that can make selections that are a single row, single column, rectangular and elliptical. This tool can also crop an image; it allows for better control. In contrast to the crop tool, the marquee tool allows for more adjustments to the selected area before cropping.

The only marquee tool that does not allow cropping is the elliptical. Although the single row and column marquee tools allow for cropping, they are not ideal, because they only crop a line. The rectangular marquee tool is the preferred option. Once the tool has been selected, dragging the tool across the desired area will select it.

The selected area will be outlined by dotted lines, referred to as \”marching ants\”. To set a specific size or ratio, the tool options bar provides these settings. Before selecting an area, the desired size or ratio must be set by adjusting the width and height. Any changes such as color, filters, location, etc.

To crop the selection, the user must go to the image tab and select crop. The lasso tool is similar to the marquee tool, however, the user can make a custom selection by drawing it freehand. The regular lasso tool allows the user to have drawing capabilities. Photoshop will complete the selection once the mouse button is released. The user may also complete the selection by connecting the end point to the starting point.

The \”marching ants\” will indicate if a selection has been made. The polygonal lasso tool will draw only straight lines, which makes it an ideal choice for images with many straight lines. Unlike the regular lasso tool, the user must continually click around the image to outline the shape. To complete the selection, the user must connect the end point to the starting point just like the regular lasso tool. Magnetic lasso tool are considered the smart tool. It can do the same as the other two, but it can also detect the edges of an image once the user selects a starting point.

It detects by examining the color pixels as the cursor moves over the desired area. Closing the selection is the same as the other two, which should also should display the \”marching ants\” once the selection has been closed. The quick selection tool selects areas based on edges, similarly to the magnetic lasso tool. The difference between this tool and the lasso tool is that there is no starting and ending point. For this reason, the selected area can be added onto as much as possible without starting over.

By dragging the cursor over the desired area, the quick selection tool detects the edges of the image. The \”marching ants\” allow the user to know what is currently being selected. Once the user is done, the selected area can be edited without affecting the rest of the image. One of the features that makes this tool especially user friendly is that the SHIFT key is not needed to add more to the selection; by default, extra mouse clicks will be added to the selection rather than creating a new selection.

The magic wand tool selects areas based on pixels of similar values.

Он почувствовал, как вокруг него выросла стена, и понял, что ему не удастся выпутаться из этой ситуации, по крайней мере своевременно. И он в отчаянии прошептал ей на ухо: – Сьюзан… Стратмор убил Чатрукьяна. – Отпусти ее, – спокойно сказал Стратмор.  – Она тебе все равно не поверит.

В трех тысячах миль от Вашингтона мини-автобус мобильного наблюдения мчался по пустым улицам Севильи. Он был позаимствован АНБ на военной базе Рота в обстановке чрезвычайной секретности. Двое сидевших в нем людей были напряжены до предела: они не в первый раз получали чрезвычайный приказ из Форт-Мида, но обычно эти приказы не приходили с самого верха.

Агент, сидевший за рулем, повернув голову, бросил через плечо: – Есть какие-нибудь следы нашего человека.

 
 

 

Olympus PEN E-P5 Review.Acdsee pro 8 with crack free

 
Limitations: trial version offers an unlimited number of scans, backup, restore of your windows registry for FREE. Full version must be purchased. It supports such operating systems as Windows 10, Windows 8 / , Windows 7 and Windows Vista (64/32 bit). File Size: MB, Download time. Adobe Photoshop is a raster graphics editor developed and published by Adobe Inc. for Windows and replace.me was originally created in by Thomas and John replace.me then, the software has become the industry standard not only in raster graphics editing, but in digital art as a whole. The software\’s name is often colloquially used as a verb (e.g. \”to photoshop an . SpyHunter 5 specially designed to protect you COMPUTER from the harmful infections like Trojan horses, computer worms, and rootkits. The program is developed and released by Enigma Software. SpyHunter 5 Crack Serial Key Full Keygen Free Download. SpyHunter 5 Crack is a tool which offers the complete security against the malware and the spyware. Jul 14,  · 【軟體名稱】：Autodesk AutoCAD + key 【軟體版本】： 32bit 【軟體分類】：繪圖 【軟體語言】：繁體中文版 【檔案大小】：65bit GB.

You should not rely solely on information contained in this email to evaluate the product or service being endorsed. Always exercise due diligence before purchasing any product or service. This website contains advertisements. We use cookies to personalize content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyze our traffic.

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website. This site uses functional cookies and external scripts to improve your experience. Which cookies and scripts are used and how they impact your visit is specified on the left. You may change your settings at any time. Your choices will not impact your visit. NOTE: These settings will only apply to the browser and device you are currently using.

This website uses cookies. Contents hide. Yes, I love the power of 10mm pistols in a small frame Yes, it\’s a great addition to my collection Maybe I\’ll buy one No, not my thing at all View Results. Share this December 16, at AM. PatrickNub says:. December 16, at PM. Edwardfrady says:. December 17, at AM. December 17, at PM. December 18, at PM.

December 19, at AM. December 19, at PM. Yondus says:. December 20, at PM. December 21, at AM. December 21, at PM. December 22, at AM.

December 22, at PM. December 23, at AM. Ronaldcrito says:. You certainly have the original FW 1. The fixed version should be FW 1. Perhaps it is best just to wait now – since it has been confirmed from various sites, oly is really working an a short term fix.

For the time being I activate live histogram – so that a force the camera to show the actual exposure settings. For me the workaround is having the histogram on, and wait for the 1. However Olympus could have made the menu implementation of the anti-shock simpler and lamentable documentation of the feature much better.

Thank goodness for various reviews which documented and illustrated how to implement. The menu system for this camera must be the most convoluted and obscure ever. Unfortunately FW 1. I would be happy if I could! But that seems to be impossible I have never \”road tested\” the EP5 – but what is significantly different in its mechanism than the EP2 that causes this blurring? The E-P2 was merely a quick update to the E-P1.

Okay, grain boundaries were hit very quickly, but that was not a big issue. I used to have ASA kodak negatives published at A3 – the vagaries of the printing process for all but the most expensive publications hid a multitude of sins – lpi on poor stock and cheap ink was the norm.

I now have a PEN an old EP2, no rush to upgrade – and it\’s still important to have a range of possibilities when shooting offset litho is much better in the digital age too, so resolution and grain are important.

Of course, I could buy a full frame camera – but I have never liked bulk and don\’t fancy lumping those ridiculously ugly plastic bricks about. Its all a happy compromise, as ever. Does anybody remember Kodachrome 25? It was a very slow film that, given a decent camera, produced smooth, sharp slides, with great dynamic range. That\’s ISO 25 folks. The reason we all craved fast lenses was so we could use un-speckled films with greater freedom.

That\’s the point, wide latitude to shoot. It\’s why we badmouth the odd camera–it takes away our freedom. On an entry level SLR, f1. So here we are, electronic sensors that take us out to ISO without much noise, and a step more with heavier noise reduction that steals a bit of detail.

Typical kit zooms nowadays all start at f3. That is two stops slower than f1. Have it all. The standard primes used to be quite inexpensive. The marketing department sticking it to us is what happened On the other hand it is great fun shooting in candle light with my M at ISO or above and f0.

I still use Kodak T-Max in my M4 but film grain is somehow much more acceptable than digital noise. The reduction in the noise of sensors over the last few years increases possibilities of imaging by a lot.

That means the shake problem cannot be fix when sequential shooting. Of course you drop rate to about fps at H Sequential. Now year later E-M1 is receiving a fv4. In any case there seem to be still 2 shutter movements. One before and one after the exposure. Side remark: Despite of extensive testing I have never been able to find clear evidence of shutter induced blur with FW 1. And I don\’t see a clear improvement in this respect with FW 1. Any Ideas or observations?

Thanks, Paul. Sensor is then reset via electronic first curtain and the exposure ends in a regular way with mechanical 2nd curtain. I assume that 25ms difference is hard to observe by hearing. Thanks, Alien, for shedding light on the issue. I wonder, why Oly does not take the opportunity to communicate more clearly about it. Much of the confusion is unnecessary. Thank you also for the reference. Very interesting findings indeed!

Good God Based on the positive assessment of dpreview I updated my E-P5 from firmware 1. An update to the actual value can only be forced by a user interaction like pressing a button on the camera, a user interaction on the lens if that forces a display update like changing the focal length or bringing up the magnified view when changing the focus or if the \”live histogram\” display is active. BTW: I like the new wifi remote control much more than the first implementation and ironically the metering update works on the smartphone app – but not on the camera itself – the former one being a nice-to-have, the latter one a must-have.

Yes, I have the same metering problem after the update. Hi Michael, Thank you for confirming the issue on your side. When I realized what happened with my camera I couldn\’t believe Olympus has released a FW introducing such a massive bug. So I doubted my camera probably has an individual issue Probably the issue arises due to updating directly from FW 1. Was that what you did as well?

Just had a telephone conversation with Olympus Service Europe and they claim, did not hear of any issue with FW 1.

Next FW update? Unknown if any. This is frustrating. It could be key to actively communicate the issue to the oly service department so that the issue gets priority. What do you think? PN: Oly service Europe meanwhile acknowledged a a second statement, they can reproduce the bug and communicated it to japan I don\’t think the problem is specific to updating directly from 1. I\’m pretty sure I had 1.

Well I think I did anyway, can\’t say for sure. I updated 2 h ago. When I set to A mode the S value is live when I move the camera – and so on in the other modes. It counts both for the display and the VF 4, which I had mounted during the update. Did I misunderstand something? So you are lucky!

Both seem to force continuous display updates? Or is it due to the fact you are using VF 4, which I don\’t have? Perhaps we can learn from your configuration and find a workaround until a bugfix is available! It sadly won\’t change the way DPR rates the pen. The ratings are just that, ratings. Ever had the increasing feeling that the ratings are strongly influenced by personal bias? It would be nice if ratings were totally objective, yes.

Even when a consistent attempt is made for objectivity, small mistakes are made because there is a need for subtle snobbery felt as a means of asserting a high ground that is appealing to readers, the currency of credibility and an assurance to the like-minded that you haven\’t lost yours. Each statement gets equal weight regardless of merit. Now as far as the PEN goes.

I had one, but it got stolen, and I am thinking about getting another It does seems that the hard points on the camera map are the DSLR and Pocket Camera, and that everything in between seems not so quite well established, like there is a period of experimentation whilst the jury is out.

There are some great answers and the PEN is one of them. There is a market and ALL the camera companies are running a business, so it should not be a surprise that polemics are a part of the game. It is ideal to just leave the antishock on all the time. At higher speeds it\’s not used, even if turned on.

Thanks for reviewing the E-P5 again. Although I don\’t agree with the results. Your gold award is not granted because of the inflation of the camera within the year. That\’s fine, but if you compare the camera with the A comparison I can clearly see blurred backgrounds because of the shuttershock or other issues as well. Even the A7r flagship is having trouble with this issue it seems Nice job, Olympus!

My dream camera is one that doesn\’t have this problem from the start. This problem existed on my OMD EM5 and cost me quite a number of great shots, one of the many reasons I sold the camera besides paint coming off after a few weeks, the well documented screen crack issue, etc. Nice job Olympus? How about offering a replacement for what I see as a manufacturing defect. I suppose they could take your camera back, upgrade the firmware, and return it to you.

Problem fixed! Of course I realize your camera is only 18 months old, so you will demand a fresh one. Or you could just switch to a nice Nikon D It is still unclear to me whether the OM-D E-M10 or the Pen E-P2 and others so far not addressed with this fix will get or should have this type of fix. DP Review\’s assurances on this isssue being fixed as far as the M10 is concerned are conditioned quite rightly in their review by the phrase \’in our testing\’. And not a thing from C. Nishino on the subject or anyone else at Olympus see below.

Once again this loyal and long term customer waits for a positive and constructive response. At some point, looking too hard for problems make the results irrelevant in average, real-world uses. Anti-Shock setting, so for E-M5 users this would be welcome too but I\’m not sure if this will happen at some point in time.

So, Oly made a less than stellar camera. It will be interesting to see if they can actually fix this problem.

Regardless, Oly\’s performance and product development over the past decade, or so, has been first class. For the sake of the good will the company has developed, I hope there is a fix. If there isn\’t, I hope Oly is treated no more or less harshly than the big two. You want to know if they can fix a mechanical issue? I believe they have made a reasonable result within the firmware for this situation that appears to be a very usable fix. You can\’t do that to fix for oil splatters on sensors by another camera maker.

At least Olympus replaced my display bezel with a tiny insignificant crack from a slightly over tightened screw on the E-M5. This is something that should have been caught in the testing department at Olympus.

Nikon has been replacing whole cameras with dust spots on sensors without admitting there was a problem. For them it involved an unpublished design change and a quick change to a different model number to give everybody something else to think about than focus on something Nikon missed. Mistakes and problems occur. When computers are involved, a problem is called an \”issue\” to mask the seriousness of the problem.

The problem with problems is that, unlike issues, sometimes there is no solution, short of redesigning or replacing the product. No company is perfect, and at least with Oly a simple if rather late forthcoming firmware upgrade fixes the problem. The unfortunate thing is that this issue was found on the E-P1 five years ago. Olympus has had five years to solve this problem. Even more embarrassing for Olympus, is that dpreview and Imaging Resouces has become the quality control department for Olympus.

To be honest, shutter shock, and mirror shock have been problems with a lot of cameras, even before digital. The tiny size of the mirrorless cameras are making the problem worse, and as you can see, companies are slowly dealing with the issue.

Once shutters go away completely it will be a moot issue. The transition phase is however, unpleasant. I\’m not saying it can\’t be done, but it was easy to apply the fix on the E-P5 after first doing it on the EM1. Just to point out a typo in line 4 of the final para of the updated review: \’received\’ not \’recieved\’. Infared I don\’t think you know what that means. The correct term would be \”Grammar Nazi\”, tho DPR are always appreciative of people pointing out mistakes in their articles.

Personally, I do not think I am kind of a \”Grammar Nazi\”. But I think that good communication between people starts with speaking the same language. And \”same\” implies \”correct\” because bad English is not equivalent to good English. English is not my mother tongue but I always try to do my best to detect and correct my own typos Doing so is just being respectful of my readers Also, I would have thought it would be \”Spelling Nazi\”.

Or is it too intrusive? Can\’t attest to the EP5 but on the EM1 it works perfectly. As you know \”anti-shock 0sec\” for E-M1 has been updated and we believe that this update can help to resolve the shutter shock issue you mentioned. However, we are planning to update the firmware for E-P5 similar to \”anti-shock 0sec\” as well. Please wait for the update to be released for a while. We are sorry but we are not able to tell you when the update will be released at this point.

Please check Olympus homepage from time to time for the latest information of firmware. We appreciated your kind cooperation and understanding, looking forward to see your satisfaction on our service and product.

I\’m not sure if buy E-PL5 again or go to this beauty with the extra cost. I have 17mm f1. My wife will love photo story and wifi connection for her whats app groups she does not have facebook will it work straigthforeward? The m43 75mm f1. I\’d use the 60mm Macro since it\’s in the same ballpark as the 50mm with regards to sharpness. Does focus peaking require electronic coupling between camera and lens?? If it\’s like the E-M1, I think you have to set focus peaking to a function button.

Dig in the menus and reassign one of the buttons to do just that. The camera doesn\’t know when your manual focusing with legacy glass, you have to tell it through the function button.

Hmmm -reminds of certain brand with purple spot issues that got high ratings somehow This cameras pretty convenient and the qualities nice. And adapters are ok to play around with cameras, but definitely not convenient for serious shooting. Manual lenses can work fine for sports. Just ask the Sports Illustrated photographers from the \’s. Just an amazing camera. Mine is in for repair right now as the main dial was not changing info on every click I have no shutter shock issue that I can find, tho.

Tested in all the modes, shutter speeds with MANY lenses I believe this may be a manufacturing or a batch issue I think Olympus needs to be responsible to its loyal customers and issue a statement or fix? BOTH of these situations are widely documented on the web C\’mon Olympus I totally avoid the Panoramic auto detect mode out of paranoia from reading about this \”issue\”. Hi, I have noticed my E-P5 front dial is starting to only sometimes change settings, or do its job, sometimes it does nothing.

I googled it and this comment of yours came up first. What country are you in, and has Olympus given you any trouble over this warranty repair? Have you heard if it is a common problem with the dials going bad? I haven\’t seen any shutter shock either. I wonder if it is more common for users who don\’t use a viewfinder.

DPreview editors, could you please enlighten me us how to activate the tone curve settings? I haven\’t been able to get to the secret chamber Page 14 of the review Image Options explains this: However, rather than offering the OM-D\’s handy in-viewfinder tone curve diagram, the P5 requires you to press the exposure compensation button, then the INFO button, then use the left and right buttons to adjust the shadow response. Pressing INFO again changes attention to the highlight portion of the curve.

But first, make sure that you have dedicated one of the camera\’s buttons to exposure compensation. I am still struggeling. The camera was at Olympus for the second time. They changed the complete CCD unit this time.

But the issue is still there. Sometimes I shoot 10 to 20 pictures without any fault. Then out of the next 10 pictures 5 are completely blurred. All with the same lens and settings 17mm 1. The camera focusses, I get the green focus frame and light in the upper right corner, confirming focus set to focus priority of course , I hear the IBIS working as usual, but the picture is not sharp. Check these pictures, the were shot in a sequence within a few minutes:.

I am not sure if this is \’shutter shock\’ or another fault during taking and processing the picture. My test at 42mm 84mm ff eq. A far more comprehensive test in the following link also revealed no such issue whatsoever:. Any news from the shuttershock issue cameras? I own the camera for 3 months now, but I don\’t have a telelens. Till 60mm I don\’t have the shuttershock issue when using the right technique of making images That was a lot easier with my nikon D and D ;- But on the other hand, try to make a nice shot with the D and the mm macro attached!

With a shutter speed of it will be quite difficult to make a sharp image. And have you tried it with a mm handheld? No chance all of making a sharp image with shutter speed 80 or so. I\’m getting used to the EP-5 now, and to be honest I like it more and more! Have used the EP5 for a couple of months now and have not experience the shutter shock issue some users have reported. I am wondering if the issue reported may be batch dependent? Goodbye ep5. The blurring of images is totally unacceptable.

Too many ruined photos. Shame, loved everything else about it. I won\’t be buying another Pen – they have obviously dropped the ball with the QC on the pen line. Having had the E-P5 for three months, I\’ve re-read your review and make the following 2 comments. That setting is for Landscape Panning. For the photos in your examples, the general IS-1 would be appropriate.

If your problem is vertical use IS If horizontal use IS The last length I entered. If I mount a Sigma 30mm, 30mm appears at the top right of the screen. The stabilizer setting remains at 15mm. Which is why I change the stabilizer setting the match the lens. I don\’t suppose this would be relevant, unless pixel peeking is practiced, but if the stabilizer automatically recognizes a native lens, why does the recorded stabilizer setting not change automatically?

The stabilizer focal length setting will always show the last focal length that was manually set. When using a native lens though you should notice that the FL in the bottom right corner is grayed out meaning it\’s not being used. It only becomes active white when using a non native lens. So I read the review. Are you sure that is not caused by Parkinsons? The stabilisation should take care of any roller blind shutter slap. The first of the sample videos is plain over-exposed not uncommon in that kind of setting.

The second sample has no bass in the sound when compared to my SH videos , suggesting the wind shield setting was at its highest. I get the impression the reviewer does not like video anyway. The level of customisation possible is stupendous indeed, yet the P5 does not look as knob-encrusted as my SPUZ. There\’s no statement from Oly Singapore as of today after my communication with them but so far the I\’ve tried at least 4 sets of the Pen but i\’ve not experienced the said shutter shock issue.

I really hope to see the phenomenon yes, in a warped sense. Here is what I got back from Olympus support: \”I also saw your second email with the sample images, thank you for sending these samples.

Please note that as mentioned on the DPreview article you referenced, this type of problem is not considered a mechanical defect of the camera, and in most case is due to vibration introduced by pressing the shutter button or vibration coming from other moving mechanisms of the camera.

This can also vary by many other factors, such as lens used and way of holding the camera. To reach higher levels of sharpness in critical situations, the \’Anti Shock\’ function available in the Menu that can help reduce this blur. If you feel strongly, even after using the anti shock function and tripod, that there may be something else wrong with your camera, we encourage you to send this in to our service center for testing, and possible repair or adjustments.

For instructions on how to send this item to the Olympus service center\”. Update: Following on the release of a significant new v1. Version 1.

One before and one after the exposure. Side remark: Despite of extensive testing I have never been able to find clear evidence of shutter induced blur with FW 1. And I don\’t see a clear improvement in this respect with FW 1. Any Ideas or observations? Thanks, Paul. Sensor is then reset via electronic first curtain and the exposure ends in a regular way with mechanical 2nd curtain.

I assume that 25ms difference is hard to observe by hearing. Thanks, Alien, for shedding light on the issue. I wonder, why Oly does not take the opportunity to communicate more clearly about it.

Much of the confusion is unnecessary. Thank you also for the reference. Very interesting findings indeed! Good God Based on the positive assessment of dpreview I updated my E-P5 from firmware 1. An update to the actual value can only be forced by a user interaction like pressing a button on the camera, a user interaction on the lens if that forces a display update like changing the focal length or bringing up the magnified view when changing the focus or if the \”live histogram\” display is active.

BTW: I like the new wifi remote control much more than the first implementation and ironically the metering update works on the smartphone app – but not on the camera itself – the former one being a nice-to-have, the latter one a must-have. Yes, I have the same metering problem after the update. Hi Michael, Thank you for confirming the issue on your side.

When I realized what happened with my camera I couldn\’t believe Olympus has released a FW introducing such a massive bug. So I doubted my camera probably has an individual issue Probably the issue arises due to updating directly from FW 1.

Was that what you did as well? Just had a telephone conversation with Olympus Service Europe and they claim, did not hear of any issue with FW 1. Next FW update? Unknown if any. This is frustrating. It could be key to actively communicate the issue to the oly service department so that the issue gets priority. What do you think?

PN: Oly service Europe meanwhile acknowledged a a second statement, they can reproduce the bug and communicated it to japan I don\’t think the problem is specific to updating directly from 1. I\’m pretty sure I had 1.

Well I think I did anyway, can\’t say for sure. I updated 2 h ago. When I set to A mode the S value is live when I move the camera – and so on in the other modes. It counts both for the display and the VF 4, which I had mounted during the update.

Did I misunderstand something? So you are lucky! Both seem to force continuous display updates? Or is it due to the fact you are using VF 4, which I don\’t have? Perhaps we can learn from your configuration and find a workaround until a bugfix is available! It sadly won\’t change the way DPR rates the pen. The ratings are just that, ratings.

Ever had the increasing feeling that the ratings are strongly influenced by personal bias? It would be nice if ratings were totally objective, yes. Even when a consistent attempt is made for objectivity, small mistakes are made because there is a need for subtle snobbery felt as a means of asserting a high ground that is appealing to readers, the currency of credibility and an assurance to the like-minded that you haven\’t lost yours.

Each statement gets equal weight regardless of merit. Now as far as the PEN goes. I had one, but it got stolen, and I am thinking about getting another It does seems that the hard points on the camera map are the DSLR and Pocket Camera, and that everything in between seems not so quite well established, like there is a period of experimentation whilst the jury is out.

There are some great answers and the PEN is one of them. There is a market and ALL the camera companies are running a business, so it should not be a surprise that polemics are a part of the game. It is ideal to just leave the antishock on all the time. At higher speeds it\’s not used, even if turned on. Thanks for reviewing the E-P5 again. Although I don\’t agree with the results. Your gold award is not granted because of the inflation of the camera within the year.

That\’s fine, but if you compare the camera with the A comparison I can clearly see blurred backgrounds because of the shuttershock or other issues as well. Even the A7r flagship is having trouble with this issue it seems Nice job, Olympus!

My dream camera is one that doesn\’t have this problem from the start. This problem existed on my OMD EM5 and cost me quite a number of great shots, one of the many reasons I sold the camera besides paint coming off after a few weeks, the well documented screen crack issue, etc.

Nice job Olympus? How about offering a replacement for what I see as a manufacturing defect. I suppose they could take your camera back, upgrade the firmware, and return it to you. Problem fixed! Of course I realize your camera is only 18 months old, so you will demand a fresh one. Or you could just switch to a nice Nikon D It is still unclear to me whether the OM-D E-M10 or the Pen E-P2 and others so far not addressed with this fix will get or should have this type of fix.

DP Review\’s assurances on this isssue being fixed as far as the M10 is concerned are conditioned quite rightly in their review by the phrase \’in our testing\’. And not a thing from C. Nishino on the subject or anyone else at Olympus see below. Once again this loyal and long term customer waits for a positive and constructive response. At some point, looking too hard for problems make the results irrelevant in average, real-world uses.

Anti-Shock setting, so for E-M5 users this would be welcome too but I\’m not sure if this will happen at some point in time. So, Oly made a less than stellar camera.

It will be interesting to see if they can actually fix this problem. Regardless, Oly\’s performance and product development over the past decade, or so, has been first class. For the sake of the good will the company has developed, I hope there is a fix. If there isn\’t, I hope Oly is treated no more or less harshly than the big two. You want to know if they can fix a mechanical issue?

I believe they have made a reasonable result within the firmware for this situation that appears to be a very usable fix. You can\’t do that to fix for oil splatters on sensors by another camera maker. At least Olympus replaced my display bezel with a tiny insignificant crack from a slightly over tightened screw on the E-M5.

This is something that should have been caught in the testing department at Olympus. Nikon has been replacing whole cameras with dust spots on sensors without admitting there was a problem.

For them it involved an unpublished design change and a quick change to a different model number to give everybody something else to think about than focus on something Nikon missed.

Mistakes and problems occur. When computers are involved, a problem is called an \”issue\” to mask the seriousness of the problem. The problem with problems is that, unlike issues, sometimes there is no solution, short of redesigning or replacing the product.

No company is perfect, and at least with Oly a simple if rather late forthcoming firmware upgrade fixes the problem. The unfortunate thing is that this issue was found on the E-P1 five years ago. Olympus has had five years to solve this problem.

Even more embarrassing for Olympus, is that dpreview and Imaging Resouces has become the quality control department for Olympus. To be honest, shutter shock, and mirror shock have been problems with a lot of cameras, even before digital. The tiny size of the mirrorless cameras are making the problem worse, and as you can see, companies are slowly dealing with the issue. Once shutters go away completely it will be a moot issue. The transition phase is however, unpleasant.

I\’m not saying it can\’t be done, but it was easy to apply the fix on the E-P5 after first doing it on the EM1. Just to point out a typo in line 4 of the final para of the updated review: \’received\’ not \’recieved\’. Infared I don\’t think you know what that means. The correct term would be \”Grammar Nazi\”, tho DPR are always appreciative of people pointing out mistakes in their articles. Personally, I do not think I am kind of a \”Grammar Nazi\”. But I think that good communication between people starts with speaking the same language.

And \”same\” implies \”correct\” because bad English is not equivalent to good English. English is not my mother tongue but I always try to do my best to detect and correct my own typos Doing so is just being respectful of my readers Also, I would have thought it would be \”Spelling Nazi\”.

Or is it too intrusive? Can\’t attest to the EP5 but on the EM1 it works perfectly. As you know \”anti-shock 0sec\” for E-M1 has been updated and we believe that this update can help to resolve the shutter shock issue you mentioned. However, we are planning to update the firmware for E-P5 similar to \”anti-shock 0sec\” as well. Please wait for the update to be released for a while.

We are sorry but we are not able to tell you when the update will be released at this point. Please check Olympus homepage from time to time for the latest information of firmware. We appreciated your kind cooperation and understanding, looking forward to see your satisfaction on our service and product.

I\’m not sure if buy E-PL5 again or go to this beauty with the extra cost. I have 17mm f1. My wife will love photo story and wifi connection for her whats app groups she does not have facebook will it work straigthforeward?

The m43 75mm f1. I\’d use the 60mm Macro since it\’s in the same ballpark as the 50mm with regards to sharpness. Does focus peaking require electronic coupling between camera and lens?? If it\’s like the E-M1, I think you have to set focus peaking to a function button.

Dig in the menus and reassign one of the buttons to do just that. The camera doesn\’t know when your manual focusing with legacy glass, you have to tell it through the function button. Hmmm -reminds of certain brand with purple spot issues that got high ratings somehow This cameras pretty convenient and the qualities nice.

And adapters are ok to play around with cameras, but definitely not convenient for serious shooting. Manual lenses can work fine for sports. Just ask the Sports Illustrated photographers from the \’s. Just an amazing camera. Mine is in for repair right now as the main dial was not changing info on every click I have no shutter shock issue that I can find, tho.

Tested in all the modes, shutter speeds with MANY lenses I believe this may be a manufacturing or a batch issue I think Olympus needs to be responsible to its loyal customers and issue a statement or fix? BOTH of these situations are widely documented on the web C\’mon Olympus I totally avoid the Panoramic auto detect mode out of paranoia from reading about this \”issue\”.

Hi, I have noticed my E-P5 front dial is starting to only sometimes change settings, or do its job, sometimes it does nothing. I googled it and this comment of yours came up first. What country are you in, and has Olympus given you any trouble over this warranty repair? Have you heard if it is a common problem with the dials going bad? I haven\’t seen any shutter shock either. I wonder if it is more common for users who don\’t use a viewfinder. DPreview editors, could you please enlighten me us how to activate the tone curve settings?

I haven\’t been able to get to the secret chamber Page 14 of the review Image Options explains this: However, rather than offering the OM-D\’s handy in-viewfinder tone curve diagram, the P5 requires you to press the exposure compensation button, then the INFO button, then use the left and right buttons to adjust the shadow response.

Pressing INFO again changes attention to the highlight portion of the curve. But first, make sure that you have dedicated one of the camera\’s buttons to exposure compensation. I am still struggeling. The camera was at Olympus for the second time. They changed the complete CCD unit this time. But the issue is still there. Sometimes I shoot 10 to 20 pictures without any fault. Then out of the next 10 pictures 5 are completely blurred.

All with the same lens and settings 17mm 1. The camera focusses, I get the green focus frame and light in the upper right corner, confirming focus set to focus priority of course , I hear the IBIS working as usual, but the picture is not sharp. Check these pictures, the were shot in a sequence within a few minutes:. I am not sure if this is \’shutter shock\’ or another fault during taking and processing the picture.

My test at 42mm 84mm ff eq. A far more comprehensive test in the following link also revealed no such issue whatsoever:. Any news from the shuttershock issue cameras? CS4 features smoother panning and zooming, allowing faster image editing at a high magnification. The interface is more simplified with its tab-based interface [56] making it cleaner to work with.

Photoshop CS4 features a new 3D engine allowing the conversion of gradient maps to 3D objects, adding depth to layers and text, and getting print-quality output with the new ray-tracing rendering engine. It supports common 3D formats; the new Adjustment and Mask panels; content-aware scaling seam carving ; [57] fluid canvas rotation and File display options. Adobe released Photoshop CS4 Extended, which has the features of Adobe Photoshop CS4, plus capabilities for scientific imaging, 3D, motion graphics, accurate image analysis and high-end film and video users.

The faster 3D engine allows users to paint directly on 3D models, wrap 2D images around 3D shapes and animate 3D objects. Photoshop CS5 was launched on April 12, In May , Adobe Creative Suite 5. Its version of Photoshop, The community also had a hand in the additions made to CS5 as 30 new features and improvements were included by request.

These include automatic image straightening, the Rule-of-Thirds cropping tool, color pickup, and saving a bit image as a JPEG. Another feature includes the Adobe Mini Bridge, which allows for efficient file browsing and management. A new materials library was added, providing more options such as Chrome, Glass, and Cork.

The new Shadow Catcher tool can be used to further enhance 3D objects. For motion graphics, the tools can be applied to over more than one frame in a video sequence. Photoshop CS6, released in May , added new creative design tools and provided a redesigned interface [65] with a focus on enhanced performance.

Adobe Photoshop CS6 brought a suite of tools for video editing. Color and exposure adjustments, as well as layers, are among a few things that are featured in this new editor. Upon completion of editing, the user is presented with a handful of options of exporting into a few popular formats.

CS6 brings the \”straighten\” tool to Photoshop, where a user simply draws a line anywhere on an image, and the canvas will reorient itself so that the line drawn becomes horizontal, and adjusts the media accordingly. This was created with the intention that users will draw a line parallel to a plane in the image, and reorient the image to that plane to more easily achieve certain perspectives.

CS6 allows background saving, which means that while another document is compiling and archiving itself, it is possible to simultaneously edit an image. CS6 also features a customizable auto-save feature, preventing any work from being lost.

With version Adobe also announced that CS6 will be the last suite sold with perpetual licenses in favor of the new Creative Cloud subscriptions, though they will continue to provide OS compatibility support as well as bug fixes and security updates as necessary.

Starting January 9, , CS6 is no longer available for purchase, making a Creative Cloud license the only purchase option going forward. Photoshop CC As the next major version after CS6, it is only available as part of a Creative Cloud subscription. Major features in this version include new Smart Sharpen, Intelligent Upsampling, and Camera Shake Reduction for reducing blur caused by camera shake.

Since the initial launch, Adobe has released two additional feature-bearing updates. The first, version The major features in this version were Adobe Generator, a Node. Photoshop Version CC features improvements to content-aware tools, two new blur tools spin blur and path blur and a new focus mask feature that enables the user to select parts of an image based on whether they are in focus or not.

Other minor improvements have been made, including speed increases for certain tasks. Photoshop CC was released on June 15, Adobe added various creative features including Adobe Stock, which is a library of custom stock images. It also includes and have the ability to have more than one layer style. The updated UI as of November 30, , delivers a cleaner and more consistent look throughout Photoshop, and the user can quickly perform common tasks using a new set of gestures on touch-enabled devices like Microsoft Surface Pro.

Photoshop CC was released on November 2, It introduced a new template selector when creating new documents, the ability to search for tools, panels and help articles for Photoshop, support for SVG OpenType fonts and other small improvements.

Photoshop CC version 19 was released on October 18, It featured an overhaul to the brush organization system, allowing for more properties such as color and opacity to be saved per-brush and for brushes to be categorized in folders and sub-folders. It also added brush stroke smoothing, and over brushes created by Kyle T. Webster following Adobe\’s acquisition of his website, KyleBrush. Other additions were Lightroom Photo access, Variable font support, select subject, copy-paste layers, enhanced tooltips, panorama and HEIF support, PNG compression, increased maximum zoom level, symmetry mode, algorithm improvements to Face-aware and selection tools, color and luminance range masking, improved image resizing, and performance improvements to file opening, filters, and brush strokes.

Photoshop CC was released on October 15, Beginning with Photoshop CC version This version Introduced a new tool called Frame Tool to create placeholder frames for images. It also added multiple undo mode, auto-commitment, and prevented accidental panel moves with lock work-space. Live blend mode previews are added, allowing for faster scrolling over different blend mode options in the layers panel.

Other additions were Color Wheel, Transform proportionally without Shift key, Distribute spacing like in Illustrator, ability to see longer layer names, match font with Japanese fonts, flip document view, scale UI to font, reference point hidden by default, new compositing engine, which provides a more modern compositing architecture is added which is easier to optimize on all platforms. Photoshop was released on November 4, It added several improvements to the new content-aware fill and to the new document tab.

Also added were animated GIF support, improved lens blur performance and one-click zoom to a layer\’s contents. It introduced new swatches, gradients, patterns, shapes and stylistic sets for OpenType fonts. Presets are now more intuitive to use and easier to organize. With the February update version This version improved GPU based lens blur quality and provided performance improvements, such as accelerating workflows with smoother panning, zooming and navigation of documents.

Version 21 was the first version where the iPad version was released. It introduced faster portrait selection, Adobe Camera Raw improvements, auto-activated Adobe Fonts, rotatable patterns, and improved Match Font. This is the first macOS release to run natively on Apple silicon. Content Credentials Beta was introduced. When enabled, the editing information is captured in a tamper-evident form and resides with the file through successive copy generations.

It aligns with the C2PA standard on digital provenance across the internet. The Adobe Photoshop family is a group of applications and services made by Adobe Inc. Several features of the Adobe Photoshop family are pixel manipulating, image organizing, photo retouching, and more.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Raster graphics editing software. For the colloquial verb meaning photograph manipulation, see Photoshop verb. For other uses, see Photoshop disambiguation. For the vector graphics language, see PostScript. Adobe Photoshop Thomas Knoll John Knoll. List of languages. Main article: Photoshop plugin. This section may need to be rewritten to comply with Wikipedia\’s quality standards. You can help. The talk page may contain suggestions.

July You can help by adding to it. September Retrieved July 20, Adobe Inc. Retrieved November 13, Retrieved January 31, Retrieved February 29, The Verge. Retrieved March 1, Retrieved November 7, Archived from the original on June 26, Retrieved June 15, Story Photography. May 23, Retrieved May 23, February 28, Archived from the original on July 1, Retrieved October 15, Graphics Software.

Retrieved August 13, Mac Publishing. Dennis Publishing Ltd. Raja January 13, The Hindu. Retrieved August 10, Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved January 23, Securities and Exchange Commission. February 22, Archived from the original on February 24, What Opens a PSD? File Format List from WhatIs. Retrieved May 12, Retrieved December 17, Nik Software Inc.

Topaz Labs, LLC. August 31, Auto FX Software. AV Bros. Archived from the original on October 15, This gives you a ton of options at your disposal, especially for holsters.

Not only will you be able to use sights if you have a suppressor mounted, but you can also co-witness with an optic. Its round frame compensates for all the potential recoil a 10mm can bring. Can you shoot. Its mild recoil, wide availability of accessories, and standard optics mount makes it a new standard for tiny, but mighty guns. View Results. Let us know in the comments section below! Follow us on Facebook , Instagram , Twitter , and Pinterest! Disclaimer: All content on this site is for informational purposes only.

Please read our full disclaimer here. Fone Safe3 Web Vulnerability Scanner 9. Hd Clone 4. Your email address will not be published. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. By using this form you agree with the storage and handling of your data by this website. Email: [email protected] Phone: All Rights Reserved This copyrighted material may not be republished without express permission. The information presented here is for general educational purposes only.

You should not rely solely on information contained in this email to evaluate the product or service being endorsed. Always exercise due diligence before purchasing any product or service.

Jun 09,  · AOMEI Backupper所有版本 +激活密鑰下載. AOMEI Backupper Activation Key 是一個專業軟件，可以幫助您備份文件，文件夾和分區，並在需要時進行還原。 AOMEI Backupper是適用於台式機，筆記本電腦和工作站的最佳備份軟件之一。. Jun 09,  · Winrar Crack 是一款功能強大的文件存檔提取器和文件存檔生成器，適用於32BIt和64BIT架構。 通過該程序，您可以輕鬆創建任何類型的存檔，例如ZIP和RAR，並儘可能地壓縮文件。 您還可以處理高達8萬億千兆字節的大文件，從而輕鬆進行壓縮或提取。. Snagit v Crack + Keygen Free Download SnagIt Crack + Keygen Full Free Download SnagIt is a professional software for capturing and recording your screen. Experience has shown that educational tutorials have a great impact on teaching computer-related topics, and they are much more effective than educational books.
Free software download,The biggest software directory for freeware and shareware download at replace.me 大阪府泉大津市豊中町3−15−8. 中古車(U-Car) FAX ショールーム～ メンテナンス:作業内容により作業時間が異なりますので、店舗までお問い合わせ . SpyHunter 5 specially designed to protect you COMPUTER from the harmful infections like Trojan horses, computer worms, and rootkits. The program is developed and released by Enigma Software. SpyHunter 5 Crack Serial Key Full Keygen Free Download. SpyHunter 5 Crack is a tool which offers the complete security against the malware and the spyware. Jun 09,  · Winrar Crack 是一款功能強大的文件存檔提取器和文件存檔生成器，適用於32BIt和64BIT架構。 通過該程序，您可以輕鬆創建任何類型的存檔，例如ZIP和RAR，並儘可能地壓縮文件。 您還可以處理高達8萬億千兆字節的大文件，從而輕鬆進行壓縮或提取。.
قابلیت های نرم افزار ACDSee Proپشتیبانی از تقریبا همه فرمت های رایج موجودقابليت Print عکس با بهترين کيفيت ممکن.رايت تصاوير و فايل هاي Multimedia بر روي CD/DVDتبدیل فرمت ها به یکدیگرنمایش تصاویر با بهترین کیفیتتغییر اندازه. Jul 14,  · 【軟體名稱】：Autodesk AutoCAD + key 【軟體版本】： 32bit 【軟體分類】：繪圖 【軟體語言】：繁體中文版 【檔案大小】：65bit GB. Free software download,The biggest software directory for freeware and shareware download at replace.me

We use cookies to personalize content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyze our traffic. You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website. This site uses functional cookies and external scripts to improve your experience.

Which cookies and scripts are used and how they impact your visit is specified on the left. You may change your settings at any time. Your choices will not impact your visit. NOTE: These settings will only apply to the browser and device you are currently using.

This website uses cookies. Contents hide. Yes, I love the power of 10mm pistols in a small frame Yes, it\’s a great addition to my collection Maybe I\’ll buy one No, not my thing at all View Results.

Share this December 16, at AM. PatrickNub says:. December 16, at PM. Edwardfrady says:. December 17, at AM. December 17, at PM. December 18, at PM. December 19, at AM. December 19, at PM. Yondus says:. December 20, at PM. December 21, at AM. December 21, at PM. December 22, at AM. December 22, at PM. December 23, at AM. Ronaldcrito says:. December 27, at AM.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply Your email address will not be published. American Gun Association – When you seek second amendment news, honest gun reviews and gun-friendly advice. For the time being I activate live histogram – so that a force the camera to show the actual exposure settings.

For me the workaround is having the histogram on, and wait for the 1. However Olympus could have made the menu implementation of the anti-shock simpler and lamentable documentation of the feature much better.

Thank goodness for various reviews which documented and illustrated how to implement. The menu system for this camera must be the most convoluted and obscure ever. Unfortunately FW 1.

I would be happy if I could! But that seems to be impossible I have never \”road tested\” the EP5 – but what is significantly different in its mechanism than the EP2 that causes this blurring? The E-P2 was merely a quick update to the E-P1. Okay, grain boundaries were hit very quickly, but that was not a big issue. I used to have ASA kodak negatives published at A3 – the vagaries of the printing process for all but the most expensive publications hid a multitude of sins – lpi on poor stock and cheap ink was the norm.

I now have a PEN an old EP2, no rush to upgrade – and it\’s still important to have a range of possibilities when shooting offset litho is much better in the digital age too, so resolution and grain are important. Of course, I could buy a full frame camera – but I have never liked bulk and don\’t fancy lumping those ridiculously ugly plastic bricks about.

Its all a happy compromise, as ever. Does anybody remember Kodachrome 25? It was a very slow film that, given a decent camera, produced smooth, sharp slides, with great dynamic range. That\’s ISO 25 folks. The reason we all craved fast lenses was so we could use un-speckled films with greater freedom. That\’s the point, wide latitude to shoot. It\’s why we badmouth the odd camera–it takes away our freedom. On an entry level SLR, f1.

So here we are, electronic sensors that take us out to ISO without much noise, and a step more with heavier noise reduction that steals a bit of detail. Typical kit zooms nowadays all start at f3.

That is two stops slower than f1. Have it all. The standard primes used to be quite inexpensive. The marketing department sticking it to us is what happened On the other hand it is great fun shooting in candle light with my M at ISO or above and f0. I still use Kodak T-Max in my M4 but film grain is somehow much more acceptable than digital noise.

The reduction in the noise of sensors over the last few years increases possibilities of imaging by a lot. That means the shake problem cannot be fix when sequential shooting. Of course you drop rate to about fps at H Sequential. Now year later E-M1 is receiving a fv4. In any case there seem to be still 2 shutter movements. One before and one after the exposure. Side remark: Despite of extensive testing I have never been able to find clear evidence of shutter induced blur with FW 1.

And I don\’t see a clear improvement in this respect with FW 1. Any Ideas or observations? Thanks, Paul. Sensor is then reset via electronic first curtain and the exposure ends in a regular way with mechanical 2nd curtain.

I assume that 25ms difference is hard to observe by hearing. Thanks, Alien, for shedding light on the issue. I wonder, why Oly does not take the opportunity to communicate more clearly about it. Much of the confusion is unnecessary. Thank you also for the reference. Very interesting findings indeed! Good God Based on the positive assessment of dpreview I updated my E-P5 from firmware 1.

An update to the actual value can only be forced by a user interaction like pressing a button on the camera, a user interaction on the lens if that forces a display update like changing the focal length or bringing up the magnified view when changing the focus or if the \”live histogram\” display is active. BTW: I like the new wifi remote control much more than the first implementation and ironically the metering update works on the smartphone app – but not on the camera itself – the former one being a nice-to-have, the latter one a must-have.

Yes, I have the same metering problem after the update. Hi Michael, Thank you for confirming the issue on your side. When I realized what happened with my camera I couldn\’t believe Olympus has released a FW introducing such a massive bug. So I doubted my camera probably has an individual issue Probably the issue arises due to updating directly from FW 1. Was that what you did as well? Just had a telephone conversation with Olympus Service Europe and they claim, did not hear of any issue with FW 1.

Next FW update? Unknown if any. This is frustrating. It could be key to actively communicate the issue to the oly service department so that the issue gets priority. What do you think? PN: Oly service Europe meanwhile acknowledged a a second statement, they can reproduce the bug and communicated it to japan I don\’t think the problem is specific to updating directly from 1.

I\’m pretty sure I had 1. Well I think I did anyway, can\’t say for sure. I updated 2 h ago. When I set to A mode the S value is live when I move the camera – and so on in the other modes.

It counts both for the display and the VF 4, which I had mounted during the update. Did I misunderstand something? So you are lucky! Both seem to force continuous display updates? Or is it due to the fact you are using VF 4, which I don\’t have? Perhaps we can learn from your configuration and find a workaround until a bugfix is available! It sadly won\’t change the way DPR rates the pen.

The ratings are just that, ratings. Ever had the increasing feeling that the ratings are strongly influenced by personal bias? It would be nice if ratings were totally objective, yes. Even when a consistent attempt is made for objectivity, small mistakes are made because there is a need for subtle snobbery felt as a means of asserting a high ground that is appealing to readers, the currency of credibility and an assurance to the like-minded that you haven\’t lost yours.

Each statement gets equal weight regardless of merit. Now as far as the PEN goes. I had one, but it got stolen, and I am thinking about getting another It does seems that the hard points on the camera map are the DSLR and Pocket Camera, and that everything in between seems not so quite well established, like there is a period of experimentation whilst the jury is out.

There are some great answers and the PEN is one of them. There is a market and ALL the camera companies are running a business, so it should not be a surprise that polemics are a part of the game. It is ideal to just leave the antishock on all the time. At higher speeds it\’s not used, even if turned on. Thanks for reviewing the E-P5 again. Although I don\’t agree with the results. Your gold award is not granted because of the inflation of the camera within the year.

That\’s fine, but if you compare the camera with the A comparison I can clearly see blurred backgrounds because of the shuttershock or other issues as well. Even the A7r flagship is having trouble with this issue it seems Nice job, Olympus! My dream camera is one that doesn\’t have this problem from the start. This problem existed on my OMD EM5 and cost me quite a number of great shots, one of the many reasons I sold the camera besides paint coming off after a few weeks, the well documented screen crack issue, etc.

Nice job Olympus? How about offering a replacement for what I see as a manufacturing defect. I suppose they could take your camera back, upgrade the firmware, and return it to you. Problem fixed! Of course I realize your camera is only 18 months old, so you will demand a fresh one. Or you could just switch to a nice Nikon D It is still unclear to me whether the OM-D E-M10 or the Pen E-P2 and others so far not addressed with this fix will get or should have this type of fix.

DP Review\’s assurances on this isssue being fixed as far as the M10 is concerned are conditioned quite rightly in their review by the phrase \’in our testing\’. And not a thing from C. Nishino on the subject or anyone else at Olympus see below.

Once again this loyal and long term customer waits for a positive and constructive response. At some point, looking too hard for problems make the results irrelevant in average, real-world uses. Anti-Shock setting, so for E-M5 users this would be welcome too but I\’m not sure if this will happen at some point in time. So, Oly made a less than stellar camera. It will be interesting to see if they can actually fix this problem. Regardless, Oly\’s performance and product development over the past decade, or so, has been first class.

For the sake of the good will the company has developed, I hope there is a fix. If there isn\’t, I hope Oly is treated no more or less harshly than the big two. You want to know if they can fix a mechanical issue? I believe they have made a reasonable result within the firmware for this situation that appears to be a very usable fix. You can\’t do that to fix for oil splatters on sensors by another camera maker. At least Olympus replaced my display bezel with a tiny insignificant crack from a slightly over tightened screw on the E-M5.

This is something that should have been caught in the testing department at Olympus. Nikon has been replacing whole cameras with dust spots on sensors without admitting there was a problem.

For them it involved an unpublished design change and a quick change to a different model number to give everybody something else to think about than focus on something Nikon missed. Mistakes and problems occur. When computers are involved, a problem is called an \”issue\” to mask the seriousness of the problem. The problem with problems is that, unlike issues, sometimes there is no solution, short of redesigning or replacing the product.

No company is perfect, and at least with Oly a simple if rather late forthcoming firmware upgrade fixes the problem. The unfortunate thing is that this issue was found on the E-P1 five years ago. Olympus has had five years to solve this problem. Even more embarrassing for Olympus, is that dpreview and Imaging Resouces has become the quality control department for Olympus.

To be honest, shutter shock, and mirror shock have been problems with a lot of cameras, even before digital. The tiny size of the mirrorless cameras are making the problem worse, and as you can see, companies are slowly dealing with the issue. Once shutters go away completely it will be a moot issue.

The transition phase is however, unpleasant. I\’m not saying it can\’t be done, but it was easy to apply the fix on the E-P5 after first doing it on the EM1. Just to point out a typo in line 4 of the final para of the updated review: \’received\’ not \’recieved\’. Infared I don\’t think you know what that means. The correct term would be \”Grammar Nazi\”, tho DPR are always appreciative of people pointing out mistakes in their articles.

Personally, I do not think I am kind of a \”Grammar Nazi\”. But I think that good communication between people starts with speaking the same language. And \”same\” implies \”correct\” because bad English is not equivalent to good English. English is not my mother tongue but I always try to do my best to detect and correct my own typos Doing so is just being respectful of my readers Also, I would have thought it would be \”Spelling Nazi\”. Or is it too intrusive? Can\’t attest to the EP5 but on the EM1 it works perfectly.

As you know \”anti-shock 0sec\” for E-M1 has been updated and we believe that this update can help to resolve the shutter shock issue you mentioned. However, we are planning to update the firmware for E-P5 similar to \”anti-shock 0sec\” as well. Please wait for the update to be released for a while. We are sorry but we are not able to tell you when the update will be released at this point. Please check Olympus homepage from time to time for the latest information of firmware. We appreciated your kind cooperation and understanding, looking forward to see your satisfaction on our service and product.

I\’m not sure if buy E-PL5 again or go to this beauty with the extra cost. I have 17mm f1. My wife will love photo story and wifi connection for her whats app groups she does not have facebook will it work straigthforeward? The m43 75mm f1. I\’d use the 60mm Macro since it\’s in the same ballpark as the 50mm with regards to sharpness.

Does focus peaking require electronic coupling between camera and lens?? If it\’s like the E-M1, I think you have to set focus peaking to a function button.

Dig in the menus and reassign one of the buttons to do just that. The camera doesn\’t know when your manual focusing with legacy glass, you have to tell it through the function button. Hmmm -reminds of certain brand with purple spot issues that got high ratings somehow This cameras pretty convenient and the qualities nice.

And adapters are ok to play around with cameras, but definitely not convenient for serious shooting. Manual lenses can work fine for sports. Just ask the Sports Illustrated photographers from the \’s. Just an amazing camera. Mine is in for repair right now as the main dial was not changing info on every click I have no shutter shock issue that I can find, tho.

Tested in all the modes, shutter speeds with MANY lenses I believe this may be a manufacturing or a batch issue I think Olympus needs to be responsible to its loyal customers and issue a statement or fix? BOTH of these situations are widely documented on the web C\’mon Olympus I totally avoid the Panoramic auto detect mode out of paranoia from reading about this \”issue\”.

Hi, I have noticed my E-P5 front dial is starting to only sometimes change settings, or do its job, sometimes it does nothing. I googled it and this comment of yours came up first. What country are you in, and has Olympus given you any trouble over this warranty repair? Have you heard if it is a common problem with the dials going bad?

I haven\’t seen any shutter shock either. I wonder if it is more common for users who don\’t use a viewfinder. DPreview editors, could you please enlighten me us how to activate the tone curve settings? I haven\’t been able to get to the secret chamber Page 14 of the review Image Options explains this: However, rather than offering the OM-D\’s handy in-viewfinder tone curve diagram, the P5 requires you to press the exposure compensation button, then the INFO button, then use the left and right buttons to adjust the shadow response.

Pressing INFO again changes attention to the highlight portion of the curve. But first, make sure that you have dedicated one of the camera\’s buttons to exposure compensation. I am still struggeling.

The camera was at Olympus for the second time. They changed the complete CCD unit this time. But the issue is still there. Sometimes I shoot 10 to 20 pictures without any fault. Then out of the next 10 pictures 5 are completely blurred. All with the same lens and settings 17mm 1. The camera focusses, I get the green focus frame and light in the upper right corner, confirming focus set to focus priority of course , I hear the IBIS working as usual, but the picture is not sharp.

Check these pictures, the were shot in a sequence within a few minutes:. I am not sure if this is \’shutter shock\’ or another fault during taking and processing the picture. My test at 42mm 84mm ff eq. A far more comprehensive test in the following link also revealed no such issue whatsoever:. Any news from the shuttershock issue cameras? I own the camera for 3 months now, but I don\’t have a telelens.

Till 60mm I don\’t have the shuttershock issue when using the right technique of making images That was a lot easier with my nikon D and D ;- But on the other hand, try to make a nice shot with the D and the mm macro attached!

With a shutter speed of it will be quite difficult to make a sharp image. And have you tried it with a mm handheld? No chance all of making a sharp image with shutter speed 80 or so. I\’m getting used to the EP-5 now, and to be honest I like it more and more! Have used the EP5 for a couple of months now and have not experience the shutter shock issue some users have reported.

I am wondering if the issue reported may be batch dependent? Goodbye ep5. The blurring of images is totally unacceptable. Too many ruined photos. Shame, loved everything else about it.

I won\’t be buying another Pen – they have obviously dropped the ball with the QC on the pen line. Having had the E-P5 for three months, I\’ve re-read your review and make the following 2 comments.

That setting is for Landscape Panning. For the photos in your examples, the general IS-1 would be appropriate. If your problem is vertical use IS If horizontal use IS The last length I entered. If I mount a Sigma 30mm, 30mm appears at the top right of the screen. The stabilizer setting remains at 15mm. Which is why I change the stabilizer setting the match the lens. I don\’t suppose this would be relevant, unless pixel peeking is practiced, but if the stabilizer automatically recognizes a native lens, why does the recorded stabilizer setting not change automatically?

The stabilizer focal length setting will always show the last focal length that was manually set. When using a native lens though you should notice that the FL in the bottom right corner is grayed out meaning it\’s not being used. It only becomes active white when using a non native lens. So I read the review. Are you sure that is not caused by Parkinsons? The stabilisation should take care of any roller blind shutter slap. The first of the sample videos is plain over-exposed not uncommon in that kind of setting.

The second sample has no bass in the sound when compared to my SH videos , suggesting the wind shield setting was at its highest. I get the impression the reviewer does not like video anyway. The level of customisation possible is stupendous indeed, yet the P5 does not look as knob-encrusted as my SPUZ. There\’s no statement from Oly Singapore as of today after my communication with them but so far the I\’ve tried at least 4 sets of the Pen but i\’ve not experienced the said shutter shock issue.

I really hope to see the phenomenon yes, in a warped sense. Here is what I got back from Olympus support: \”I also saw your second email with the sample images, thank you for sending these samples. Please note that as mentioned on the DPreview article you referenced, this type of problem is not considered a mechanical defect of the camera, and in most case is due to vibration introduced by pressing the shutter button or vibration coming from other moving mechanisms of the camera.

This can also vary by many other factors, such as lens used and way of holding the camera. To reach higher levels of sharpness in critical situations, the \’Anti Shock\’ function available in the Menu that can help reduce this blur.

If you feel strongly, even after using the anti shock function and tripod, that there may be something else wrong with your camera, we encourage you to send this in to our service center for testing, and possible repair or adjustments. For instructions on how to send this item to the Olympus service center\”. Update: Following on the release of a significant new v1.

Version 1. Firmware v1. The latter was added to help prevent blurred images at certain shutter speeds – our main gripe when we reviewed the camera. The update not only adds a trigger-only \’cable release\’ mode to its Wi-Fi functions, it also provides a feature to combat the biggest problem with the camera.

மஹிந்தவுக்கு எதிரான பௌத்த மகாசங்கத்தின் அறிவிப்பு எதை. ACDSee 8; ACDSee Photo Studio 2; ACDSee pro 4; ACDSee Pro 3 1; ACDSee Pro 3 Keygen 1; ACDSee Pro 3 Serial Number 1; acdsee pro 4 1; acdsee pro 5 1; ACDSee Pro 6 1; ACDSee Pro 7 1; ACDSee Pro 8 1; Audio Editor 1; AutoCAD 1; AutoCAD 1; Burner Software 1; CAD 1; camtasia 1; camtasia 1; camtasia studio 2; camtasia studio 7 1; CD DVD. Free software download,The biggest software directory for freeware and shareware download at replace.me